<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki Evaluation Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/</link>
	<description>assistant professor, suny oswego</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:32:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: First steps to classification &#171; Colligo: Reflections of a Learning Technologist</title>
		<link>http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>First steps to classification &#171; Colligo: Reflections of a Learning Technologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>[...] of evaluation of the task. In terms of the assessment of the task, I came across a blog post by Ulises Mejias (2006), who explored a criteria for summative evaluation of wikis as a learning technology in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of evaluation of the task. In terms of the assessment of the task, I came across a blog post by Ulises Mejias (2006), who explored a criteria for summative evaluation of wikis as a learning technology in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah</title>
		<link>http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ulisesmejias.com/2006/01/23/wiki-evaluation-methods/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Hi Ulises,

We have been thinking about this a bit at &lt;a href=&quot;http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Center&lt;/a&gt;, and have even run &lt;a href=&quot;http://ssa05.annenberg.edu/pmwiki/socialsoftware/index.php?n=Main.WikiEvaluationSurvey&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a few surveys&lt;/a&gt; that partially address this question.

My favorite questions on this survey are the ones about students showing their work to others outside the class, and visual diagram which asks the students to describe their impression of the connections within the wiki.

Do you know about &lt;a href=&quot;http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IBM&#039;s history flow tool&lt;/a&gt;?  We have been playing around w/ it a bit, but honestly no is sure what to make of the information it presents.

Far more promising, I think, are tools which can help in visualizing the connections across the entire wiki, not just the texture of the conversation on a single page.

I am thinking about tools like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.solutionwatch.com/252/visualizing-delicious-roundup/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;delicious visualization tools&lt;/a&gt;, but constrained to a particular wiki instance.  I know of &lt;a href=&quot;http://tecfax.unige.ch/portails/mediawiki/index.php/Special:WikiViz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one plugin&lt;/a&gt; like this for mediawiki, but its nothing special.

Would be very interesting to brainstorm more on this - Curious to hear your thoughts on improving our surveys... what questions would you ask?

Best,
/Jonah
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ulises,</p>
<p>We have been thinking about this a bit at <a href="http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu" rel="nofollow">the Center</a>, and have even run <a href="http://ssa05.annenberg.edu/pmwiki/socialsoftware/index.php?n=Main.WikiEvaluationSurvey" rel="nofollow">a few surveys</a> that partially address this question.</p>
<p>My favorite questions on this survey are the ones about students showing their work to others outside the class, and visual diagram which asks the students to describe their impression of the connections within the wiki.</p>
<p>Do you know about <a href="http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/" rel="nofollow">IBM&#8217;s history flow tool</a>?  We have been playing around w/ it a bit, but honestly no is sure what to make of the information it presents.</p>
<p>Far more promising, I think, are tools which can help in visualizing the connections across the entire wiki, not just the texture of the conversation on a single page.</p>
<p>I am thinking about tools like the <a href="http://www.solutionwatch.com/252/visualizing-delicious-roundup/" rel="nofollow">delicious visualization tools</a>, but constrained to a particular wiki instance.  I know of <a href="http://tecfax.unige.ch/portails/mediawiki/index.php/Special:WikiViz" rel="nofollow">one plugin</a> like this for mediawiki, but its nothing special.</p>
<p>Would be very interesting to brainstorm more on this &#8211; Curious to hear your thoughts on improving our surveys&#8230; what questions would you ask?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
/Jonah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
