The networked society and its outsides: Interview with Geert Lovink
(photo and interview: Ulises Mejias, Creative Commons 2008)
Geert Lovink is a media theorist, net critic and activist (bio, blog, publications). He is the founding director of the Amsterdam-based Institute of Network Cultures, where I sat with him to chat on May 22.
SEARCH ENGINES AND […]
Entries Tagged as 'politics and global justice'
Conversations Below Sea Level: Geert Lovink
May 27th, 2008 · 2 Comments
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice
Politics and the Web
April 26th, 2008 · 1 Comment
Earlier this month, I had the opportunity to travel to London to attend Politics: Web 2.0: An International Conference, hosted by the New Political Communication Unit (NPCU), Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London.
The theme of the conference was summarized as follows:
Has there been a shift in political use of the […]
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice · presentations
Confinement, Education and the Control Society
August 25th, 2006 · 2 Comments
Perhaps it’s not surprising that Foucault, the “panopticon guy”, is characterized as a thinker of power, discipline, and punishment. But as Deleuze (1995) points out, Foucault also believed that we are increasingly moving away from being societies based on discipline to societies based on control. According to Deleuze’s reading of Foucault: “We’re moving toward control […]
Tags: online learning · politics and global justice
“Socialist” Software
May 5th, 2006 · 4 Comments
A case can be made that Social Software contributes to the commodification of knowledge and social interactions, or that it is simply a way for companies to make money off your labor/data. But as we know, there’s more to it than that. Social Software can also embody a set of social practices that are downright, […]
Tags: collaboration and technology · online learning · politics and global justice
Telepistemology, Combat Robots, and Human Pacman
April 8th, 2005 · 2 Comments
[The following comments were presented during the War and (Computer/Video) Gaming session at the Occupied Spaces Symposium, Roy H. Park School of Communications, Ithaca College, April 8 and 9, 2005.]
First, I want to thank Patty Zimmerann for inviting me to this symposium. Patty played a vital role in my intellectual development when I was an […]
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice
Un-Empathic Nation?
November 20th, 2004 · No Comments
According to exit polls in the recent 2004 elections, 22% of respondents identified ‘Moral Values’ as the most important issue in the presidential race (CNN, 2004). Of the seven issues presented in the survey (Taxes, Education, Iraq, Terrorism, Economy/Jobs, Moral Values, and Health Care), ‘Moral Values’ ranked the highest, slightly above the Economy/Jobs (20%) and […]
Tags: politics and global justice
Norbert Elias: Technology and Momentary Lapses Into Barbarism
March 8th, 2004 · No Comments
In his essay Technization and Civilization, Norbert Elias discusses how technologies can bring about more civilized as well as more barbaric behaviors…
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice
The limits of e-Democracy: Between Public and Mass
January 27th, 2004 · 4 Comments
The use of electronic means of communication for expressly political ends is creating a lot of buzz about eDemocracy, Emergent Democracy, eCitizenship or whatever one wants to call it. Opinions about what exactly eDemocracy will engender range from narratives about enhancing the current democratic process with new ways of engagement and participation, to a total reconceptualization of how society should govern itself. In general, most proponents of eDemocracy assume the following:
-eDemocracy will increase participation in politics and will make politics matter again.
-The power of eDemocracy will lie not in its ability to connect average people to their representatives, but in allowing average people to collaborate, organize, and help themselves.
-eDemocracy will work because we finally have access to low-cost tools to manage the volume and complexity of information that we must pay attention to in order to act as well-informed citizens.
-We are just waiting for the next eDemocracy killer app, the Napster of internet politics, to bring it all together.
Now, behind most of these assumptions is the idea that eDemocracy will revolutionize politics because it will re-empower the public. If the public consists of individuals in dialogue with each other, it stands to reason that the internet–which we are discovering is a great tool for communication–can greatly enhance the democratic process.
Unfortunately,
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice
Technology and Blindness to Suffering
January 18th, 2004 · 2 Comments
Surely there is no more blatant sign of dehumanization than the inability to react to suffering. And yet, underscoring technological progress throughout the ages is the drive to obliterate the experience of suffering. We want to be immune to the suffering of others, and we want to be immune to our own suffering.
Pierre Flourens, a French physician living in the times of Victor Hugo, wrote the following about the effects of anaesthetics:
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice
Postmodernism, Virtuality, Globalization and the (fragmented) Self - 3/3
December 21st, 2003 · No Comments
But are technology and virtuality inherently oppressive? Can they not be instruments of subversion, even while partly complicit in capitalism? To believe that technologies cannot be re-appropriated and subverted would be to yield the power of human creativity to the will of multinational corporations. Somewhere between Audrey Lorde’s belief that the master’s tools will not dismantle the master’s house, and Ani DiFranco’s opinion that every tool is a weapon if you hold it right, there must be a productive space for technology and virtuality within praxis. If that is a possibility, we must begin by critiquing the unsustainable practices of virtuality: mainly, it’s refusal to “get real.”
Tags: collaboration and technology · politics and global justice